Submitted by fitOlderMen (not verified) on April 14, 2009 - 06:50.
erik43pgh - your response is great. It sounds like a parody. My response is certainly a parody too!!!
You wrote (my comments in brackets)...
This foolish article (and your response?) shows some of the warped thoughts that some older single men believe.
- I believe that a total top Is a total top and nothing more
(Some commenter described that they know men who have changed and who flip and who are versatile. You seem to prefer labels that should never change. But can you assume that this is how "it" should be? You seem to think that a total top looses his label if he would act or even think about getting fucked.)
- a versatile top Is a bottom
(You sound like some total bottoms who complain about versatile tops who would not deliver the total top role they would prefer. Nothing "worse" than two versatile men who are looking for a total top? Is that what you mean?)
- a versatile botom Is a total bottom with Issues because he mistakenly assumes that to be a total bottom refers to his mannerisim's
(We could ad... A total top is a top with issues because he mistakenly assumes that being even slightly bottom refers to his mannerisms.)
- also true Is that there Is a shortage of true bottoms, the world Is full of older fem bottoms that nobody wants so to pass themselves off as "versatile" Is their plan for men to find them attractive but that plan Is as silly as this article because lies wont work, except possibly for hookup sex.
(Great - so here we have ANOTHER label: "Unwanted-older-fem-bottoms" disguising as "True bottoms". Maybe we should also invent the label "Bitter-older-unwanted-former-total-top-with-no-money-for-cialis-or-caverject" to be complete?"
erik43pgh - your response is
erik43pgh - your response is great. It sounds like a parody. My response is certainly a parody too!!!
You wrote (my comments in brackets)...
This foolish article (and your response?) shows some of the warped thoughts that some older single men believe.
- I believe that a total top Is a total top and nothing more
(Some commenter described that they know men who have changed and who flip and who are versatile. You seem to prefer labels that should never change. But can you assume that this is how "it" should be? You seem to think that a total top looses his label if he would act or even think about getting fucked.)
- a versatile top Is a bottom
(You sound like some total bottoms who complain about versatile tops who would not deliver the total top role they would prefer. Nothing "worse" than two versatile men who are looking for a total top? Is that what you mean?)
- a versatile botom Is a total bottom with Issues because he mistakenly assumes that to be a total bottom refers to his mannerisim's
(We could ad... A total top is a top with issues because he mistakenly assumes that being even slightly bottom refers to his mannerisms.)
- also true Is that there Is a shortage of true bottoms, the world Is full of older fem bottoms that nobody wants so to pass themselves off as "versatile" Is their plan for men to find them attractive but that plan Is as silly as this article because lies wont work, except possibly for hookup sex.
(Great - so here we have ANOTHER label: "Unwanted-older-fem-bottoms" disguising as "True bottoms". Maybe we should also invent the label "Bitter-older-unwanted-former-total-top-with-no-money-for-cialis-or-caverject" to be complete?"
(parody end)
http://www.fitoldermen.com
fom